Commutative groups, those groups in which operand order does not change an equation's result, form Abelian groups, e.g, those groups that commute: "7 × 3 = 3 × 7". When this condition is not satisified, we say the expression is non-commutative. But from commutative groups, however, it's possible to derive cyclic groups—sets of elements that are monogenous—generated by a single element—and invertible with a single operation. So, imagine a set that, if we iterated over every other element with a particular operation, we'd be able to derive all of the elements of the set.
For a finite cyclic group, let G be the group, n be the size of the set, and e be the identity element, such that gi = gj whenever i ≡ j (mod n); like so.
The commutative property also holds over the additive group of Z, or the integers, which are isomorphic to any infinite cyclic group. And the additive group of Z/nZ, integers modulo n, is isomorphic to any finite cyclic group of n. Since all cyclic groups commute, they are all abelian groups, and all finitely produced abelian groups are the direct products of cyclic groups.
For example, the powers of 10 form an infinite subset G = {…, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, 100, 1000, …} over rational numbers. With 10 as a generator, set G is a multiplicative cyclic group. For any element a of the group, one can derive log10 a.
Our set contains 10 and 100. 101102 is equal to 101+2, which is 1000, or rather (10)(100). Every cyclic group G is Abelian because if \({\displaystyle x}, {\displaystyle y}\) are in \({\displaystyle G}\), then:
This homomorphic property is relevant in cryptography. It's also useful for computing commitments. For example, we can perform operations to verify information, like so. Let m be a message and r be a random value:
That is to say, we can compute and verify the sums of values without knowing the actual values being committed. We'll review more about commitment schemes in a later post.
No comments:
Post a Comment